8 thoughts on “Title

  1. John Hardy the theory I’ve seen is that he’s guilty, the Republicans know he’s guilty, and they don’t really care how many people know it. That’s not the point, nor is dumping him for whatever theocratic nutcase they have waiting in line (who, dollars to doughnuts, all have similar stories to tell, as do the “honorable” “gentlemen” in the committee).

    The point is to confirm him because he’s guilty, just to show that they can.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.