Econosplainin’ John Hardy Greenhouse Politics August 7, 2017 1 Minute Econosplainin’ Share this: Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Like Loading... Related Published by John Hardy Closures are a poor man's object. Objects are a poor man's closure. View all posts by John Hardy Published August 7, 2017
So exactly what Existential Comics said, only specifically the answer is yes, they should be freed, it’s good for the GDP. LikeLike Reply
I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The internet is full of people who really do start every sentence with “actually”. LikeLike Reply
Mark Gjoel no they shouldn’t be freed because it’s good for GDP. Even if it was fabulous for GDP they should remain slaves and toil ceaselessly for their masters and rightful owners. Please get your priorities right. LikeLike Reply
Maybe I’m tone-deaf today, but I thought Mark Gjoel was simply pointing out that the economist acted exactly as the comic predicted. LikeLike Reply
John Hardy Turnbull delenda est – Which only shows that you would be a terrible economist. 🙂 LikeLike Reply
Never Stop Posting 
Gradinko is right, consumers are slaves.
LikeLike
So exactly what Existential Comics said, only specifically the answer is yes, they should be freed, it’s good for the GDP.
LikeLike
Looks like a deadpan joke to me.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t be so sure about that. The internet is full of people who really do start every sentence with “actually”.
LikeLike
Mark Gjoel no they shouldn’t be freed because it’s good for GDP. Even if it was fabulous for GDP they should remain slaves and toil ceaselessly for their masters and rightful owners. Please get your priorities right.
LikeLike
Maybe I’m tone-deaf today, but I thought Mark Gjoel was simply pointing out that the economist acted exactly as the comic predicted.
LikeLike
David Megginson – Exactly.
LikeLike
I stand by my assertion that slaves should never be freed on the basis of GDP.
LikeLike
John Hardy Turnbull delenda est – Which only shows that you would be a terrible economist. 🙂
LikeLike